Want to catch up with other articles from this series?
- The straight dope on cholesterol – Part I
- The straight dope on cholesterol – Part II
- The straight dope on cholesterol – Part III
- The straight dope on cholesterol – Part IV
- The straight dope on cholesterol – Part V
- The straight dope on cholesterol – Part VI
- The straight dope on cholesterol – Part VII
- The straight dope on cholesterol – Part VIII
- The straight dope on cholesterol – Part IX
Previously we addressed these 3 concepts:
#1 — What is cholesterol?
#2 — What is the relationship between the cholesterol we eat and the cholesterol in our body?
#3 — Is cholesterol bad?
I want to thank folks for doing their best to resist the following two urges:
- Please resist asking me questions beyond the scope of this post. If it’s not in here, it will probably be in a subsequent post in this series.
- Please resist sending me your cholesterol numbers. Share your story with me and others, but understand that I can’t really comment other than to say what I pretty much say to everyone: standard cholesterol testing (including VAP) is of limited value and you should have a lipoprotein analysis using NMR spectroscopy (if you don’t know what I mean by this, that’s ok… you will soon). I can’t practice medicine over the internet.
Remember last week’s take away messages:
- Cholesterol is “just” another fancy organic molecule in our body but with an interesting distinction: we eat it, we make it, we store it, and we excrete it – all in different amounts.
- The pool of cholesterol in our body is essential for life. No cholesterol = no life.
- Cholesterol exists in 2 forms – unesterified or “free” (UC) and esterified (CE) – and the form determines if we can absorb it or not, or store it or not (among other things).
- Much of the cholesterol we eat is in the form of CE. It is not absorbed and is excreted by our gut (i.e., leaves our body in stool). The reason this occurs is that CE not only has to be de-esterified, but it competes for absorption with the vastly larger amounts of UC supplied by the biliary route.
- Re-absorption of the cholesterol we synthesize in our body (i.e., endogenous produced cholesterol) is the dominant source of the cholesterol in our body. That is, most of the cholesterol in our body was made by our body.
- The process of regulating cholesterol is very complex and multifaceted with multiple layers of control. I’ve only touched on the absorption side, but the synthesis side is also complex and highly regulated. You will discover that synthesis and absorption are very interrelated.
- Eating cholesterol has very little impact on the cholesterol levels in your body. This is a fact, not my opinion. Anyone who tells you different is, at best, ignorant of this topic. At worst, they are a deliberate charlatan. Years ago the Canadian Guidelines removed the limitation of dietary cholesterol. The rest of the world, especially the United States, needs to catch up. To see an important reference on this topic, please look here.
Concept #4 – How does cholesterol move around our body?
To understand how cholesterol travels around our body requires some understanding of the distinction between what is hydrophobic and hydrophilic. A molecule is said to be hydrophobic (also called nonpolar) if it repels water, while a molecule is said to be hydrophilic (also called polar) if it attracts water. I could spend a lot of time getting in to the nuances of these properties, but I think it’s best to just focus on the major issues. Think of your veins, arteries, and capillaries as the “waterways” or rivers of your body.
BONUS concept: Another important concept is that cell membranes are lipid bilayers (which are hydrophobic) as I wrote about last week. Hence, a hydrophilic substance cannot pass through lipid membranes. Substances that can pass through lipid membranes are said to be lipophilic. A substance that has both polar (hydrophilic) and nonpolar (hydrophobic) properties is called amphipathic. The fact that unesterified cholesterol (UC) is an amphipathic molecule is a crucial property for its location in cell membranes. CE in which the –OH group has been replaced by a long chain fatty acid is a very nonpolar or hydrophobic molecule.
If a molecule needs to travel from your gastrointestinal tract (A) to, say, a cell in your quadriceps muscle (B) it needs to get on the river and travel from point A to point B. Because blood is effectively water, (the “water” part of blood is called plasma, an aqueous solution with a bunch of “stuff” in it (e.g., red blood cells, white blood cells, other proteins, ions) there are two ways to move down the river – swim or hitch a ride on a boat.
If a molecule is hydrophilic, it can be transported in our bloodstream without any assistance – sort of like swimming freely in the river – because it is not repelled by water. Conversely, if a molecule is hydrophobic, it must have a “transporter” to move about the river because the plasma (water) wants to repel it. I know this seems like a strange concept, but if you think about it, you’ve already seen great examples in your day-to-day life:
Sugar and salt will easily dissolve in water. They are, therefore, hydrophilic. Oil does not dissolve in water. It is, therefore, hydrophobic.
By extension, a molecule of glucose (sugar) or sodium and chloride ions (salt), because of their chemical properties which I won’t detail here, will travel through plasma without assistance. A lipid will not.
All of this is a long way of saying that sterol lipids (of which cholesterol ester is the predominant form in plasma), because they are hydrophobic, need to be carried around our bloodstream. They can’t move from one place to the next without a protein transporting molecule.
In other words, cholesterol doesn’t exist in our bloodstream without something to carry it from point A to point B.
So what are these “transporting molecules” called?
The proteins that traffic collections of lipids are called apoproteins. Once bound to lipids they are called apolipoproteins, and the protein wrapped “vehicle” that transports the lipids are called lipoproteins. Many of you have probably heard this term before, but I’d like to ensure everyone really understands their important features. A crucial concept is that, for the most part, lipids go nowhere in the human body unless they are a passenger inside a protein wrapped vehicle called a lipoprotein. As their name suggests lipoproteins are part lipid and part protein. They are mostly spherical structures which are held together by a phospholipid membrane (which, of course, contains free cholesterol). The figure below shows a schematic of a lipoprotein.
You will also notice variable-sized proteins on the surface of the lipid membrane that holds the structure together. The most important of these proteins are called apolipoproteins, as I alluded to above. The apolipoproteins on the surface of lipoprotein molecules serve several purposes including:
- Assisting in the structural integrity and solubility of the lipoprotein;
- Serving as co-factors in enzymatic reactions;
- Acting as ligands (i.e., structures that help with binding) for situations when the lipoprotein needs to interact with a receptor on a cell.
Apolipoproteins come in different shapes and sizes which determine their “class.” Without getting into the details of protein structure and folding, let me focus on two important classes: apolipoprotein A-I and apolipoprotein B. Apoprotein A-I (abbreviated apoA-I), which is composed of alpha-helicies, form lipoproteins which are higher in density. (The “A” class designation stems from the fact that apoA’s migrate with alpha-proteins in an electrophoretic field). Conversely, apoprotein B (abbreviated apoB), which is predominantly composed of beta-pleated-sheets, form lipoproteins which are lower in density. (The “B” class designation stems from the fact that apoB’s migrate with beta-proteins in an electrophoretic field.)
Virtually all apoB in our body is found on low-density lipoprotein – LDL, while most apoA-I in our body is found on high-density lipoprotein – HDL. Going one step further, the main structural apoprotein on the LDL is called apoB100 (though we often shorten this to just “apoB”), and there is only one apoB molecule per particle. It’s starting to come together now with “high” and “low” density lipoproteins, isn’t it?
But there’s actually more to it.
Everything I just described above deals with the structure and surface of the lipoprotein molecule – sort of the like the hull of the ship. But, what about the cargo? Remember what started this discussion. It’s all about transporting cholesterol (and lipids) which can’t freely travel in the bloodstream. The “cargo” of these ships, what they actually carry both on their surface [molecules of cholesterol and phospholipids] and in their core [cholesteryl esters (CE) and triglycerides (TG, or triacylglycerols)] is what we’ll now turn our attention to.
The ratio of lipid-to-protein in the lipoprotein structure determines its density – which is defined as mass per unit volume. Something that has a high density is heavier for a given volume than something with a low density. The table in this link (which I’ve also included below) shows the relative density of the five main classes of lipoproteins (from most dense to least dense) as they were originally discovered using ultracentrifugation: high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL), very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), and chylomicron.
Note the very subtle difference in density between the most and least dense lipoprotein – about 10 or 15%. Conversely, note the very large difference in diameter between each lipoprotein – as much as 2 orders of magnitude. Later in this series, when we start to talk about the volume of a lipoprotein particle, this difference will be amplified 1,000 times (because volume is calculated to the third power of diameter).
Below is a figure I’ve borrowed graciously from one of Tom Dayspring’s remarkable lectures which gives you a sense of the diversity of each of these classes of lipoproteins as well as the subclasses within each class. If this topic wasn’t confusing enough, there are actually multiple nomenclatures for the HDL subparticles. Originally, nomenclature was based on their buoyancy. Today nomenclature is based on the following methods, dependent on the technology used to measure them:
- Particle separation using gradient gel electrophoretic fractionation (deployed by Berkeley Heart Lab).
- Magnetic resonance assaying of lipid terminal methyl groups, called Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, or NMR (deployed by Liposcience).
- Two-dimensional gradient gel electrophoresis and apoA-I staining (deployed by Boston Heart Lab).
We’ll cover this later, but I want to point this out now to avoid (unnecessary) confusion in the figure below, which uses the first two of these.
A few things probably jump out as you look at this figure:
- ApoA-I lipoproteins (i.e., HDLs) are tiny compared to ApoB lipoproteins (i.e., VLDL’s, IDL’s, and LDL’s) [this figure is not actually to scale – the “real” difference is even more pronounced.]
- As a general rule (with pathological exceptions), as particles move from being larger to smaller, the relative content of triglycerides (TG) goes down while the relative content of protein goes up, hence the density change.
- Actual cholesterol mass is greatest in the LDL particle.
- Each specific lipoprotein has a different core make up – meaning the variable ratio of TG to cholesterol ester changes. A particle of VLDL has 5 times more TG than CE whereas a particle of LDL typically has 4 or more times more CE than TG (i.e., ratio > 4:1), and an HDL has 90-95% CE and < 10% TG in its core.
- The TG trafficking lipoproteins are chylomicrons from the intestine and VLDLs from the liver.
Deep breath. Anyone left wondering why this topic is NOT covered in medical school? I think I can conservatively say 95% to 99% of physicians do not know what you have just learned — not because they aren’t “smart,” but because this topic is simply not covered in medical school, and the pace at which the field is developing is too great for most doctors to keep up with.
Why is cholesterol concentration increasing and triglyceride concentration decreasing as lipoproteins progress from larger to smaller?
The liver exports VLDL which, after chylomicrons (used to get triglycerides to muscles and adipocytes and cholesterol from the gut to the liver) are the largest of the lipoprotein particles. VLDL particles “give up” some of their triglycerides in the form of free fatty acids and shrink as they also release surface phospholipids. Once a certain size or buoyancy is reached it is called a “VLDL remnant” and ultimately an IDL. Some (though not all) of the IDL particles undergo continued lipolysis to reduce in size and become the famous (or infamous) LDL particles. However, most of the IDL particles are actually cleared by liver LDL receptors and do not become LDL particles.
All along this process, the larger particles “shed” phospholipids and fatty acids and thus become cholesterol-rich. It is the LDL particle that is the ultimate delivery vehicle of cholesterol back to the liver in a process now called “indirect reverse cholesterol transport.” However, under certain circumstances the LDL will penetrate and deliver its cholesterol load to the artery walls. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT WE DON’T WANT TO HAPPEN. (Sorry for the bold ALL CAPS – I know some of you may have fallen asleep by now, but I didn’t want anyone missing the punch line.) Because almost all cells in the body de-novo synthesize all the cholesterol they need, LDLs are not actually needed to deliver cholesterol to most cells.
The final important point I want to make about cholesterol transport is that it goes BOTH ways. Lipoprotein particles carry triglycerides and cholesterol from the gut and liver to the periphery (muscles and adipocytes – fat cells) for energy, cellular maintenance, and other functions like steroid creation (called “steroidogenic” purposes – remember the figure last week showing a cholesterol molecule and steroid molecule). Historically this process of returning cholesterol to the liver was thought to be performed only by HDL’s and has been termed reverse cholesterol transport, or RCT (you’ll need to subscribe — for free — to lecturepad.org to access this last link, which is well worth the time).
This RCT concept is outdated as we now know LDL’s actually perform the majority of RCT. While the HDL particle is a crucial part of the immensely complex RCT pathway, a not-so-well-known fact is that apoB lipoproteins (i.e., LDL’s and their brethren) carry most of the cholesterol back to the liver. In other words, the “bad” lipoprotein, LDL, does more of the cleaning up (i.e., taking cholesterol back to the liver) than the “good” lipoprotein, HDL!
The problem, as we’ll discuss subsequently, is that LDL’s actually do the bad stuff, too – they dump cholesterol into artery walls.
Let’s put this all together to summarize how cholesterol gets around our body
- Cholesterol and triglycerides are not soluble in plasma (i.e., they can’t dissolve in water) and are therefore said to be hydrophobic.
- To be carried anywhere in our body, say from your liver to your coronary artery, they need to be carried by a special protein-wrapped transport vessel called a lipoprotein.
- As these “ships” called lipoproteins leave the liver they undergo a process of maturation where they shed much of their triglyceride “cargo” in the form of free fatty acid, and doing so makes them smaller and richer in cholesterol.
- Special proteins, apoproteins, play an important role in moving lipoproteins around the body and facilitating their interactions with other cells. The most important of these are the apoB class, residing on VLDL, IDL, and LDL particles, and the apoA-I class, residing on the HDL particles.
- Cholesterol transport occurs in both directions, towards the periphery and back to the liver.
- The major function of the apoB-containing particles is to traffic energy (triglycerides) to muscles and phospholipids to all cells. Their cholesterol is trafficked back to the liver. The apoA-I containing particles traffic cholesterol to steroidogenic tissues, adipocytes (a storage organ for cholesterol ester) and ultimately back to the liver, gut, or steroidogenic tissue.
- All lipoproteins are part of the human lipid transportation system and work harmoniously together to efficiently traffic lipids. As you are probably starting to appreciate, the trafficking pattern is highly complex and the lipoproteins constantly exchange their core and surface lipids. This is a big reason why measuring how much cholesterol is within various lipoprotein species will in many circumstances be so misleading, as we’ll discuss subsequently in this series.
This was a bit of a tough one, so let’s stop there. Next week we’ll discuss how to actually measure cholesterol levels. In other words, if you’re looking at the river, with all its floating ships carrying their cargo, how do we measure the amount of cargo actually contained within the ships? Furthermore, is this the most important thing to be measuring? Ironically, it’s easier to measure the cargo in the ships, but more important to know the number of ships in the river. But now I’m getting ahead of myself.
P.S. Happy Birthday Dad (now I’ll know if you’re reading my blog!) [Originally posted on May 3, 2012]
“Sugar and salt will easily dissolve in water. They are, therefore, hydrophilic. Oil does not dissolve in water. It is, therefore, hydrophobic. By extension, a molecule of glucose (sugar) or sodium and chloride ions (salt), because of their chemical properties which I won’t detail here, will travel through plasma without assistance. A lipid will not.”
I’m on board with the whole fat and cholesterol are good for you in the absence of sugar and glucose, but what about salt? Based on your example above, it has the same (or similar) absorption properties as sugar where it could cause artery plaque (which jives with the conventional wisdom that a diet high in sodium is linked to heart disease). Since a lot of fatty foods are high in sodium I’m curious if you avoid those? It doesn’t seem like you do based on the sodium supplement you detail in your post on what you actually eat. Would love to know the “why” on that.
Evidence implicating sodium in hypertension is pretty weak, but may be context dependent. In other words, other dietary factors, such as fructose, may exacerbate impact of sodium on BP, if such an effect is present. Most recent report by Institute of Medicine says data implicating sodium in HTN is very poor, and low levels of sodium are probably harmful. Ketosis is a unique state that does required supplemental sodium beyond what most people get in their diet.
After thinking about this (the whole sodium thing) a little more, I came up with a perhaps oversimplified hypothesis: a sugar molecule is “stickier” than a salt molecule. If you think not of dissolving salt and sugar in a cup of water, but instead a cup of sugar and a cup of salt each with a few drops of water. The sugar becomes sticky where it interacts with water whereas the salt is still corse. This is the same idea as you mentioned, the effects of sodium may be magnified by the presence of fructose. Just a thought.
Hey Peter. I know I’m pretty late to this party but I think I have a good question. I watched a bunch of Mr Daysprings lectures (awesome…but quite dense!) and I’m struggling to tell the functional differences between HDL and LDL cholesterol. Here’s what I’ve picked up
1.They both seem to pick up and drop off cholesterol at various places, including each other.
2. It seems like LDL’s are born of VLDL’s after the VLDL’s reduce TG content at adipocytes (may be right off the mark here)
3. LDL’s dump cargo on artery walls.
4. LDL’s are wrapped in APoB HDL’s are wraped in APoA
Of course there are many more specifics may these are the key players that I could ascertain.
Is it as simple as lipid density attracting either APoA or ApoB? What am I missing? Or am I trying to imagine a functional reason because HDL is the hero and LDL is the villian?
Any help would be great. Big fan of your work. Cheers
All of our statements are more or less correct, less a few nuances, though I’m not sure I understand your specific question. Both LDL and HDL particles remove cholesterol from the subendothelial space. Their difference is that only LDL particles get retained there, and that most likely has to do with the structure of the apoB lipoprotein.
I am taking biochemistry in medical school and ran across this great series while we are studying cholesterol, lipid transport etc. In our lecture slides it states that HDL is the only carrier of cholesterol back to the liver in reverse cholesterol transport (the lecturepad link doesn’t seem to work anymore) which you state is not the case. I did a few quick Google searches for “indirect reverse cholesterol transport” and didn’t come up with much, do you happen to have a source that I may question (or grill) my professor about?
Just responded to your other question. LecturePad is place to go.
I’m not sure if my last comment posted, but I am a medical student going through biochemistry and was wondering if you had a source, or article explaining indirect reverse cholesterol transport that I could show my professor. Our lecture slides seem to indicate that HDL is the only one that carries cholesterol back to the liver by using reverse cholesterol transport (the lecturepad link on this is sadly broken in the blog post).
Is it broken, or not giving you access? One needs to sign up (for free) to access LecturePad. Go there and sign up first, then try the link.
Curious to hear an update: What were your findings with your professor re LDL transporting cholesterol back into the liver?
I Have a question regarding the role lipoproteins play in fat transport. I understand that lipoproteins transport trigs from the liver to fat cells and muscle cells, but what about when fat cells release trigs as fatty acids to be used as fuel? Are these fatty acids rebundled (if you will) as trigs on lipoproteins to be carried to muscle cells or can they be transported directly in the bloodstream as fatty acids?
I understand that lipoproteins transport trigs from the gut and liver, but am confused as to whether they also transport between fat cells and muscle cells.
They are typically transported by albumin. Also, chylomicrons transport TG from the gut, so TG and FFA transport is kind of complicated.
Peter. I’m having problems connecting your theories with practical application to the general population. Have you actually looked into Taubes books and what he says about carbohydrates and cholesterol? I think his efforts are rather deceiving and bias.
First of all, thanks for this great resource on cholesterol. I am trying to learn as much as possible.
this link, http://www.mendeley.com/research/dietary-cholesterol-and-coronary-artery-disease-a-systematic-review/ , from last weeks take away messages is broken. Can you provide a good one?
I have been following a low carb diet for about 4 months now. I am not overweight and exercise 5 days a week. I have high BP which I am treating with meds. It was a year ago I discovered my high BP at my annual physical. The blood work at that time showed I had “high” cholesterol. I just came from the doctors office now a year later. My trigs are low (50) and have not changed. What has changed is my total cholesterol. It has risen 84 points. My total is now over 300! My HDL went up 30, my LDL 54. Needless to say my doctor is not pleased. When he used a risk factor calculator of some kind, I am still okay according the the math. My ratio (TC/HDL) is 3.2, which is “good”. Trig ratio is fantastic .5. Yet I can not help but be concerned at these numbers.
I had been following a more conventional diet up until 4 months ago, high carbs, low fat. I had a blood test in October and my HDL had went up 14 points while my LDL did not move. That gave me my best TC/HDL ratio of 3.0. As I said that is when I began following a low carb diet.
Right now I am having serious doubts about the wisdom of the low carb, high fat diet. Believe me I strictly follow the parameters. I can’t help but think this diet and my substantially elevated cholesterol is not the right answer.
Thanks for putting up such a great site, you do provide lots of great insight into healthy eating.
The link to supporting research in point #7 in Section 2 (eating cholesterol) is broken – darn! and Rock on! Thank you for the tremendous gift of your time and expertise.
When scientist feed Aluminum salts in water to Wistar mice the alum levels were found to deposit into the hepatic area, liver. It makes since to follow your diet in order to avoid alum salts in food from being absorbed into the liver. In one of your lectures you also showed fat under skin and a place where aluminum salt could store. I do not find many people addressing alum salts issues in diet. Would you be interested in these published works. Thanks
I still can’t understand what’s the point of making a particle to transport cholesterol through blood when every cell is capable of make it, just to return it back to the liver once the TG were delivered…. Maybe particle stabilization?
Not every cell. Paradoxically, two types of cells that need a lot of cholesterol are not capable of making any.
Since unesterified cholesterol (UC) is an amphipathic, can it travel in blood without a carrier?
Still need a lipoprotein.
Hi Peter. You mentioned the following in this post: “However, under certain circumstances the LDL will penetrate and deliver its cholesterol load to the artery walls.”
Can you tell me, what are the certain circumstances in which the LDL penetrates the arterial wall or is it merely a random chance or perhaps simply an opportunity?
Seems related to the frequency of impact and the condition of the endothelium.
LOVE this stuff my man. I’m the owner of a wellness business that addresses a variety of realms as it relates to the subject. We have several medical affiliates as well. Some requests from you.
1) I am in the midst of writing a blog on a similar topic but very much on the simpler side for our readers. May I please sight you, your blog and specifically these articles as a source?
2) How may I go about potentially schedule talks/podcast appearances, etc. with you?
Thanks for all you’re doing and have a beautiful day!
Isn’t it amazing that the most important and scientifically relevant knowledge about cholesterol isn’t being allowed public observance by the main-stream national media outlets? WHO CONTROLS THEM? We all know. Money, power. The American Medical system is out for itself. It is no longer about truth & health. But WE THE PEOPLE, the alternative truth, won’t play into the hands of government and the drug companies, the way our medical system is being forced to. They take our health away from us but they can’t take our higher powers.
It’s not the money
It’s about food –
If you take everything known about heart problems and put this on one page – you will still know basically nothing of any pratical value –
Fifty years of useless research is all you will have –
Media – – as far as I can
see – the media is controlled by only one thing – who they work for – the editor or who ever owns the company they work for –
These people only care about making money – that and apparently there also opionated and like to see what write in print — they only want to make money so they can do this and have enough money – so everyone get’s paid
Well – the problem is – everything they write on any any matter is some kind of a lie – this is truly a bizare thing – as they have no reason to do this sort of thing – except maybe – the more lies you create – the more stuff you can write about – people only need to read the truth one time – after that they have no need of reading anything ever again –
You can’t survive writting unless people buy your stuff – so – that’s the reason –
Lies – that’s one reason – there is another – people love being told lies – they actually get giddy when they read one –
the reason for this is people have comfort zones and that’s where they like to stay – when people read a lie that is the same as what they already think – wow – it’s the cat’s pajama’s – nothing makes their day quite like reading a lie that corresponds to the lie that is already in there head –
The fastest way to go out of the writting bussines – is – to tell the truth – people who read the truth – that does not happen to equate
with the lie already in there head – are knocked out of there comfort zone – they feel actualy sick – their unlikely to believe the truth they read anyway – it’s just a bad bad thing for them –
And – there never going to buy that dam paper again –
It’s Grandma’s Fault since 1776 grandma has been baking – every day a cake or whatever with 2 cups of proccessed sugar in it – and this was every day – it would seem desert was more or or less – more being the key word here – a full time job – somebody ate all that crap –
So – as alway’s – women are too blame for most everything – you already know why we insist on keeping them around –
But to be fair -</b later – along comes this nut case named Kellog – who knows that Masterbation and not being circumsized</b are the cause of all mankinds health problems – not being circumsized is or was being the only cause of masterbation –
So – men are apparently even dumber than women –
So – every day from then on on – it's not just the pies – but the dam sugar coatet frosted flakes for the morning ritual – this – so
uncle ned and aunt may – can stop popping huge erect clits and monstrous sized boners at the breakfast table – and from going at it in the reddish garden after breakfast –
Later – along comes the idiot who invented processed oils from plants that contained
almost no oil – transfat oil –
So – now we have people eating ungodly amounts of sugar and oil –
Then – sugar from fruit hits the market –
people are now overdosing on sugar – oil and high fructose corn syrup –
The only</b – option people have and there is only one – is to eat whole natural food – raw – blanched – cooked in water (soup) – fermented (soaked on water) or whatever and zero processed sugars or oils –
So – in the end – it does not appear there is any power struggle – no one is or was – out to get anybody –
If today – everyone started eating correctly – people would stop getting sick – hospitals would reduce to almost nothing – doctors would have to – find other work – and insurance companies would go broke – and wallstreet would – particullary hegde fund managers – have a meltdown – I guess –
Jeff, food IS money. Look at the wholecloth connection. Good points. But if it all wasn’t specifically about protecting commercial interests the mainstream media advertising outlets wouldn’t be playing into the hands of the drug companies. They don’t really care as long as they themselves and their own people are protected from statin poisons. We need more public servants like Dr. Peter Attia.
Thanks for the great information, Peter! I’m very interested in the role of cholesterol in the formation of steroid hormones. Since the gonads and adrenals do not independently produce adequate cholesterol, do they rely primarily on recycled endogenous cholesterol? In cases of hormone imbalance (progesterone levels < 30 pg/mL, for example), what role does the integrity of the endothelium play (in terms of intestinal permeability and/or gut microbes) in the delivery (or lack thereof) of cholesterol to these structures? I know both insulin and fat metabolism have a significant impact on hormone manufacture, but I’m particularly curious about the role of cholesterol. The answer could probably constitute an entire blog post on its own, but any insight is appreciated!
Yes, they rely on cholesterol transport from other cells. Not sure I know the answer to your other questions.
Thank you for your series of blogs. I am a newbie, just starting a course on naturopathic nutrition and doing my biomedicine year. Cholesterol is of interest to me.
I live in the UK. Fat molecules and fat digestion interest me . From the age of 9 I developed a problem that started with whipped cream. I could pour good quality cream over my dessert, eat it and be fine. When cream was whipped, especially cream whipped in a machine at the café, and added to my apple pie, I would feel queasy and “liverish” as my mother put it. I then had abdominal migraine, although we didn’t know it was called that then. It felt as like there was something fighting, kicking and screaming to pass through my stomach walls. I would go a bit yellow and nearly pass out with the bent double pain. This was about 1974. Cheap choc ices at the cinema (probably made with some hideous vegetable oil blend) started to provoke the same response.
Nobody has ever been able to explain this to me and I wonder how the oxygen whipped in to the cream changed the molecules to make them so alien to me,
I then developed problems digesting oily fish such as wild salmon, fresh herring, fresh trout, sardines etc. Indeed my reaction was so bad that I cut them out from my diet for 30 years and more. I can now eat pickled herring, fresh salmon and trout but not fresh herring, mackerel, sardines.