Studies can be statistically powerful and significant, but practically weak and meaningless (and vice versa).
A recent study on diet and prostate cancer suggests we need to be more careful communicating and interpreting information.
If randomized-controlled trials are considered the gold standard for establishing reliable knowledge, why do we see so many observational studies in public health?
The purpose of our JC is to continually improve our ability to analyze and interpret research, and share this with the community.
Send this to friend